Archive for the ‘Medical Malpractice’ Category

Tort Reform Laws Don’t Lower Healthcare Costs

Friday, May 28th, 2010

     Medical providers, their professional associations, and lobbyists often claim that limiting recoveries in malpractice lawsuits will lower healthcare costs.  This is called tort reform, or as some of us like to refer to it, tort deform.  

      In 2004, Ohio passed a law limiting verdicts for pain and suffering to $250,000 except in catastrophic cases, restricting punitive damages and making it harder to take a case to trial.  Healthcare costs have continued to increase there despite this legislation.  According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, by 2008 the average family healthcare premiums were $11,425, an increase of 19%.  

     Neighboring Kentucky, on the other hand, did not enact similar legislation.  Nevertheless, Ohio’s increase in healthcare costs were greater than the increase in healthcare costs in Kentucky. 

     Pennsylvania, so far, has not enacted this type of legislation.  Let’s hope that the Pennsylvania legislature continues to protect victim’s rights in bringing lawsuits for fair compensation.

Court Orders Pennsylvania to Fund Malpractice Assessment Account

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

            In Pennsylvania, a medical professional fund, known as the MCARE Fund, has been established.  This Fund is used to pay malpractice claims against medical providers in excess of their basic insurance coverage.  The MCARE Fund is funded by an assessment on each participating healthcare provider.  

             In 2003, Pennsylvania enacted an abatement law to reduce or eliminate MCARE providers’ required contributions to the MCARE Fund.  To fund the abatement program, Pennsylvania established a special account known as the HCPR Account.  The HCPR Account was, in turn, funded by increased cigarette taxes and a traffic violation surcharge.  

            From 2004 to 2007, Pennsylvania appropriated $737,000,000 to the HCPR Account.  Pennsylvania, however, failed to transfer from these appropriations a sum that ranged from $446,000,000 to $616,000,000 to fund the MCARE Fund. 

            The Pennsylvania Medical Society sued the Pennsylvania agency responsible for the HCPR Account. The Commonwealth Court recently ruled in favor of The Medical Society.  The Court decided that Pennsylvania is required to transfer all of the allocated money from the HCPR Account to the MCARE Fund.  

            In terms of the so-called malpractice crisis, the Court’s decision makes an interesting statement.  Pennsylvania’s position in this lawsuit was that the MCARE Fund can meet its current obligations without the transfer of the disputed funds. This is consistent with the statistics that show that malpractice cases in Pennsylvania have been decreasing, not increasing.

New England Journal of Medicine Article: Malpractice Reform Should Focus On Disclosure and Early Resolution

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

             In a recent article published in the New England Journal of Medicine (March 31, 2010), the authors recognize that traditional methods of malpractice reform, such as state caps on non-economic damages, may not be working.  As noted in the article, this past February the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the state’s cap was unconstitutional. 

            There are three distinct types of “disclosure and offer” programs.  To discourage lawsuits, each of these programs encourage candid disclosure about medical injuries, apologies when appropriate and providing for the patient’s financial needs, in at least a limited way.  

            Early resolution of malpractice claims is a laudable goal. Some of these programs, however, require the patient to give up his right to sue. This compromises the rights of an injured victim at his most vulnerable moment. 

            Malpractice reform should focus on improving healthcare. It should also focus on disciplining the “repeat offenders” who are responsible for much of the problem.

Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filings Decrease Dramatically

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

           From 2003 to 2008, lawsuits for medical malpractice cases in Pennsylvania decreased 37% to 41% from the average number of cases filed in 2000 to 2002. This information is from statistics compiled by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. 

            Also according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, for 2008, the most recent year available, the doctor, hospital or other medical provider won in over 81% of the medical malpractice lawsuits filed.  Here in western Pennsylvania, the medical providers also won the malpractice lawsuits most of the time.  For instance, in Allegheny County the jury found in favor of the medical provider in 14 out of 17 cases, which is 82.4% of the time.  Of the three verdicts for the patient, one verdict was for $500,000 or less and two verdicts were between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.           

            Doctors and medical malpractice liability insurance companies often claim that medical malpractice lawsuits are driving up insurance costs and driving doctors out of the state.  With the dramatic decrease in malpractice lawsuits, however, this statement simply cannot be true.